📋 ASTM Abrasive Testing Hub — Technical Reference Platform Home · Standards · Particle Size

Particle Size Analysis

Sieve analysis, gradation requirements, and particle size distribution procedures for blast cleaning abrasives. Reference standard: ASTM E11 (sieve specification) and ASTM C136 (test method).

Overview & Technical Significance

Particle size distribution is the single most critical parameter governing blast cleaning performance. The gradation of abrasive media directly determines achievable anchor profile depth, coverage rate, cleaning efficiency, and dust generation. Abrasives that are too coarse produce rough, irregular profiles exceeding coating specifications; abrasives that are too fine fail to achieve adequate anchor profile depth, compromising mechanical adhesion.

Sieve analysis performed per ASTM E11 (sieve specification) and ASTM C136 (test method) provides quantitative characterization of particle size distribution as a cumulative percent passing or retained on each sieve size. Results are compared against the abrasive manufacturer's specification or project quality plan acceptance criteria.

Critical Application Note Particle size of recycled abrasive in blast pot/wheel blast machines changes continuously during operation due to particle breakdown. Particle size testing of in-service abrasive mix must be conducted at the frequency specified in the project quality plan — typically every 4 hours of operation or per shift.

ASTM E11 — Sieve Specification

ASTM E11 specifies the dimensional requirements for woven wire mesh cloth and test sieve frames used in particle size analysis. All sieves used for abrasive testing must comply with ASTM E11 or equivalent international standard (ISO 565).

Key Sieve Parameters

Sieve No.Aperture (mm)Aperture (µm)Wire Diameter (mm)Typical Abrasive Use
No. 72.8028000.800Very coarse steel grit/shot
No. 102.0020000.710Coarse steel grit G10
No. 121.7017000.630Steel grit G12
No. 141.4014000.560Steel grit G14
No. 161.1811800.500Steel grit G16
No. 181.0010000.450Steel grit G18 / Shot S330
No. 250.7107100.355Steel grit G25 / Shot S230
No. 300.6006000.315Garnet #30
No. 400.4254250.224Steel shot S110 / Garnet #40
No. 500.3003000.180Copper slag, fine abrasives
No. 700.2122120.125Fine garnet, staurolite
No. 800.1801800.120Fine mineral abrasives
No. 1000.1501500.107Very fine abrasives

Sieve Verification Requirements

Per ASTM E11, test sieves must be verified against NIST-traceable reference standards at intervals not exceeding 12 months, or immediately after any impact, dropping, or suspected damage. Verification records must be maintained and available for inspection.

SIEVE VERIFICATION CRITERIA (ASTM E11):
Maximum aperture size < 1.25× nominal aperture designation
Minimum aperture size > 0.75× nominal aperture designation
Wire diameter tolerance: ± 15% of specified value
Frame: No distortion, no holes, secure mount to frame
REJECT IF: Any aperture exceeds 1.25× nominal | Frame distorted | Holes or breaks in mesh

Sieve Analysis Test Procedure (ASTM C136)

1

Sample Preparation

Obtain a representative sample per the project sampling plan. Minimum sample mass: 300 g for fine abrasives (all passing No. 16 sieve), 500 g for coarse abrasives. Dry sample at 110°C ± 5°C for 2 hours minimum if moisture content exceeds 0.5%. Cool to room temperature in desiccator before weighing.

2

Balance Verification

Verify analytical balance calibration with NIST-traceable weights before each test session. Minimum balance resolution: 0.1 g for samples > 200 g; 0.01 g for smaller sub-samples. Record balance ID and calibration date in test record.

3

Sieve Stack Assembly

Inspect each sieve for damage before use. Assemble sieve stack in descending order of aperture size (largest on top, smallest on bottom), with pan at base. Brush each sieve clean before use — do not use wire brushes on No. 100 or finer. Record sieve IDs and verify calibration dates are current.

4

Initial Weighing

Weigh each empty sieve + pan to 0.1 g resolution. Record tare weights. Weigh total sample to 0.1 g and record as W₀ (initial sample mass). Transfer entire sample to top sieve.

5

Mechanical Shaking

Place sieve stack on mechanical shaker. Shaking time: minimum 10 minutes at amplitude per shaker manufacturer specification. After shaking, perform 1-minute additional hand shake check: if any sieve retains > 0.1% of total sample mass in additional pass, continue shaking in 5-minute increments until complete.

6

Weighing Individual Fractions

Remove each sieve and weigh with retained material to 0.1 g. Calculate retained mass by subtracting tare. Record retained mass for each sieve size. Sum all retained masses including pan and compare to W₀ — total material recovery must be within ± 0.3% of W₀. Masses outside this tolerance indicate contaminated sieves or loss, and test must be repeated.

7

Calculation & Reporting

Calculate percent retained on each sieve: %Retained = (Mass retained ÷ W₀) × 100. Calculate cumulative percent retained and cumulative percent passing. Record and compare results to acceptance criteria. Generate test report per laboratory format.


Gradation Requirements by Abrasive Type

Gradation requirements vary by abrasive type, trade designation, and service application. The following table provides typical requirements for common abrasives. Always verify against the applicable product standard (SAE J444 for steel shot/grit, project specification for mineral abrasives).

Abrasive TypeDesignationNominal Sieve RangeMin. % Retained on Upper SieveMax. % Passing Lowest Sieve
Steel GritG-10No. 7 / No. 1685% retained on No. 7≤ 10% passing No. 16
Steel GritG-16No. 12 / No. 2585% retained on No. 12≤ 10% passing No. 25
Steel GritG-25No. 16 / No. 4085% retained on No. 16≤ 10% passing No. 40
Steel ShotS-330No. 16 / No. 3585% retained on No. 16≤ 10% passing No. 35
Steel ShotS-230No. 25 / No. 5085% retained on No. 25≤ 10% passing No. 50
Garnet#30/60No. 30 / No. 6090% retained on No. 30≤ 5% passing No. 60
Copper SlagCoarseNo. 16 / No. 50Min. 80% retained on No. 16≤ 5% passing No. 50
Aluminum Oxide36 GritNo. 25 / No. 60Per ANSI B74.12Per ANSI B74.12

Sampling Procedures

Representative sampling is foundational to valid particle size testing. ASTM D75 (Standard Practice for Sampling Aggregates) provides the general framework; the following guidance is specific to blast abrasives.

Sample Sources & Minimum Quantities

Sample SourceSampling MethodMinimum IncrementsMin. Total Mass
Bulk bag (1 tonne)Trier or probe sampler5 points (top, middle, 3 sides)500 g
25 kg sackDivide lot; sample selected sacks1 sack per 10 in lot300 g per sack
Blast pot (in-service)Catch at nozzle during operation3 catches per test event200 g combined
Wheel blast machineCatch from separator output3 timed catches300 g combined
Storage hopperIncremental sampler at discharge5 timed increments500 g

Equipment Specification

Mechanical Sieve Shaker

Rotary or vibrating type. Must accept standard 200 mm or 8-inch diameter sieve stack. Amplitude and frequency per manufacturer. Timer minimum: 60-minute range. Annual calibration verification required.

Analytical Balance

Minimum capacity 2000 g; resolution 0.1 g. Calibration with NIST-traceable weights. Level indicator required. Shield from drafts. Monthly internal verification; annual external calibration.

Drying Oven

Forced-air convection oven. Temperature range: ambient to 150°C. Accuracy ±5°C at 110°C. Temperature uniformity verified with calibrated thermocouple.

Sieve Set

ASTM E11-compliant woven wire sieves, 200 mm diameter, stainless steel. Brass or stainless frames. Annual verification against NIST standards. Maintain complete chain-of-custody and verification records.


Calculation Methodology

STEP 1 — Retained Mass: mᵢ = (Sieve + retained mass) − Sieve tare mass
STEP 2 — Recovery Check: Σmᵢ / W₀ × 100 must be 99.7% to 100.3%
STEP 3 — % Retained: %Retᵢ = mᵢ / W₀ × 100
STEP 4 — Cumul. % Retained: Sum all %Ret from largest sieve to sieve i
STEP 5 — % Passing: %Passᵢ = 100 − Cumulative %Retained at sieve i
REPORT TO: Nearest 0.1% for individual fractions; 0.1% for cumulative

Acceptance Criteria Summary

✓ Conforming Result Particle size distribution falls within the gradation band specified in the applicable product standard (e.g., SAE J444) and/or project quality specification. Recovery within ±0.3% of initial sample mass.
✗ Non-Conforming Result Any sieve fraction falls outside specified gradation limits. Excess fines (material in pan) exceeding 10% is cause for rejection in most specifications. Material failing gradation must be quarantined pending disposition.

Troubleshooting

Excessive fines in pan (>10% passing smallest sieve) +
Check for crushed or degraded abrasive (especially recycled steel grit after extended use). Verify sampling location — pan fines from blast machine separator may indicate breakdown requiring abrasive replenishment. Consider conductivity testing of fines fraction for contamination.
Mass recovery outside ±0.3% tolerance +
Check sieves for clogged apertures ("blinding"). Blind sieves should be cleaned with soft brush (air jet for fine sieves). Verify balance calibration. Ensure no material was spilled during transfer. Repeat test with new sample if cause cannot be identified.
Sieve apertures appear blocked or clogged +
Remove sieve and hold against light to check for blinding. For metallic abrasives, back-brush with soft brass bristle brush. For fine sieves (No. 80 and finer), use low-pressure air jet only. Re-verify sieve apertures with calibration reference if blinding is suspected.
Results inconsistent between duplicate samples +
Sampling non-representativeness is the most common cause. Ensure incremental sampling protocol was followed. Check for sample segregation in container. Increase number of sampling increments and use riffle splitter to obtain representative sub-sample. Verify sieve shaking duration is sufficient.

Next: Contamination Testing

After verifying particle size gradation, proceed to conductivity and ionic contamination testing per ASTM D4940.

Contamination Testing Procedures →